On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 11:09:45AM -0500, Scott G. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 07:46:21AM -0400, Travis Bemann wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 12:19:48AM -0500, Scott G. Miller wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Now you just need to suggest a puzzle which is machine generatable, not
> > > > machine solvable, and not too obnoxious.
> > > 
> > > Heres one idea, but I dont think it generates enough information for a
> > > key.  I define "enough information" to be greater than 2^32 choices for
> > > someone to do a brute force insertion to cover all the possibilities
> > > mechanically.  
> > > 
> > > Easy:  Generate an image that contains a polygon formed from sparse,
> > > non-connected dots more densly packed where the letter is.  Make it
> > > significantly random.  Machine vision programs will suck at this, neural

Reply via email to