Oskar Sandberg <md98-osa at nada.kth.se> wrote: > Yeah, we left out metadata at first and then sort of forgot about it. > > Since your looking at the code: > > I`ve been ripping the interface apart quite a bit while you were gone, and > I have a whole load of changes to commit tomorrow morning as well (though > that should be pretty much the end of it). > > I settled in on a new design where all the code that is executed in the > node (with a few exceptions, ConnectionHandler threads, the Ticker, > Conduits, the ListenSocket thread) is executed by being handled like if it > was a received Message. To do this I created a MessageObject interface > which messages implement, and is anything that can be sent to the > MessageHandler.
Sometimes I wonder whether you're not actually identical twins (or maybe triplets) all pretending to the be the same person - how can you always answer email so fast?? =) Anyway, the architecture changes sound good... Just looking at the client, I can already see that it's structured a lot more cleanly than it used to be - nice work. > Does this mean we'll be getting fproxy back? yeah, that's the plan - hopefully it won't take too much effort to bring it back into sync. I'm also planning on going through the keyindexes to pick out some good keys for a "showcase" of stuff that I can verify is available and making it accessible through fproxy. theo _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
