On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 9:57 PM, [email protected] wrote: (And in case I didn't say that clear enough: This work is not intended to
force a decision in favor of the old site. I will of course accept it if the votes of the poll show that a majority wants a redesign and the value per cost of development is estimated to be high enough. Per my previous email, the current proposal is to bypass the poll through executive decision in order to get the website fixed (by a professional) ASAP. Please don't assume that, just because I proposed the prioritization mechanism, that I had abdicated my ability as project coordinator to make funding allocation decisions on behalf of the project. At no point did I say that. There will still be plenty of funding to allocate to coding and other tasks unrelated to the website, however given a website redesign, in particular, requires a skillset that the project currently lacks internally, it is a logical use of funds to pay someone with the requisite skillset to redesign it. Ian. Ian Clarke Founder, The Freenet Project Email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
