So can I assume that, since the conversation went off on some weird tangent, that everyone is comfortable with my proposal?
On Thu, May 5, 2016 6:35 PM, [email protected] wrote: On Friday, May 06, 2016 01:27:29 AM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Freitag, 6. Mai 2016, 00:33:12 schrieb [email protected]: > > You wouldn't have needed to blindguess them manually > > It wasn’t blindguessing. It was giving the numbers how Freenet can hire > peoplel without forcing them to exploit themselves. And I think that was > needed beyond the curent argument to be done in the open. Sorry, I did not mean to talk down your expertise in finances! I was just trying to say that I don't want to waste your time with having to do estimates about me due to poor information from my side. I have the precise numbers at hand, so you don't have to spend any time in calculating my cost. Anyway, what matters for this discussion is: With the current funds, Freenet can definitely get 23.6 hours/week from me, for 52 weeks._______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl Ian Clarke Founder, The Freenet Project Email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
