On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 5:33 PM, xor <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday, November 05, 2015 03:35:30 PM Ian wrote: > > Really? It looks nothing like a typical Bootstrap site. I think it > might > > have been better to stick much more closely to the standard Bootstrap CSS > > (eg. light background). > > With regards to "light background": We won't ever win this situation. > We had a light background, so people complained we should get a dark one. >
I don't know who these "people" are that advocated for a dark background, but almost no other popular website on the Internet has a dark background and light text, likely because it makes the site difficult to read (which is the feedback we've been getting). Now we have a dark one, and people complain we should get a light one. > This IMHO is just a matter of taste, both are equally valid. > If both were equally valid, then how come almost no popular website on the Internet has a dark background? Ian. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
