On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 11:21 +0100, Ximin Luo wrote: > On 26/10/15 11:19, Florent Daigniere wrote: > > On Sun, 2015-10-25 at 16:09 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Steve Dougherty <steve@asksteved > > > .com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Ian, Toad and NextGens are the only current admins of the > > > > > GitHub > > > > > org, > > > > > but none of them are very active on the project. Should we > > > > > add > > > > > another more active person as admin? > > > > > > > > That would be good. > > > > > > > > > > Definitely, any volunteers? > > > > > > > Heh; We have a Release Manager Team (toad, nextgens, Bombe, > > operhiem1); > > they can change the perms on any of the freenet repositories... > > That's > > 5 people total (if you add sanity who's in the owners team). > > > > As far as I know there's only very few things they can't do, one of > > them being "deleting" the project. > > > > What is being proposed here? Increasing the number of RMs? > > Upgrading > > the RMs to "owners"? Something else? > > > > That setup is fine, but I wasn't aware of it. The team is not listed > here: > > https://github.com/orgs/freenet/teams > > How do we make it more obvious/visible that these people have the > ability to do these things?
I've just made the RM team public. I'm not sure when they've introduced that notion of public/private teams (one of the joys of using a 3rd party service). Florent
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
