Am Donnerstag, 10. September 2015, 18:30:54 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > I did that once. Ian got really angry. Granted it's not really his > decision any more. But he's right, isn't he? Versions are for marketing, > not for change tracking?
He might have reasons I do not see, so I don’t feel I can judge that. This here is a communication issue: If there is an old version somewhere and people don’t see that this old version is actually old (0.7.5 vs. 0.7.5), then that’s a problem. If there is no place which shows that old version as the most recent one, I don’t see incrementing the version as necessary. And I should be clearer: I only mean “no longer able to update over mandatory”. Also I don’t think we need to make this a rule. I think that it’s time to increment the version regardless of this issue (for marketing reasons: we have lots of new features). Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein, ohne es zu merken. - Arne (http://draketo.de)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
