On 31/03/14 14:56, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Hi, > > misaakidis wants to add default values to visibility and trust for > friends, so we now have to take a decision. > > Which do you think is the most appropriate option for each one: > > trust: > > - HIGH > - NORMAL > - LOW > > visibility (keep in mind that we need this for FOAF!): > > - YES > - NAME-ONLY > - NO > > As identified at CTS4, it is *our* job to define the default value for > that, because new users have no chance of understanding the > implications of taking either choice. It is? How are we supposed to know the risk tolerance / risk profile of every single user?
This is precisely why we don't default to opennet. A complicating factor is people's attitudes to darknet, of course... :|
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
