On 08/01/14 19:09, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Matthew Toseland > <[email protected]>wrote: >> > Are users asking for this? >> Yes, people are asking for it. And I said it would be an optional feature. >> >> And Freenet does not compete with Tor. >> > I never said it did, nor do I believe that it does. > > But Freenet is a distributed datastore. It *stores data*, in a >> decentralised, censorship proof way. Which Tor does not do. Also IMHO in >> the long run it could have greater anonymity. We are not competing with >> Tor. We cannot possibly compete with Tor, because we do things >> differently, we provide a different product, and if all the user cares >> about is anonymity then they are going to use Tor, period. >> > Not if they are in China, where I believe Tor is quite effectively blocked > :-/ Freenet 0.7* is easy enough to block in opennet mode. I don't think the Chinese bother right now though: we're small fry.
Last year's stats: 21029 27.66% US United States 6024 7.92% RU Russian Federation 5981 7.87% DE Germany 4685 6.16% GB United Kingdom 4581 6.03% JP Japan 4162 5.47% FR France 3053 4.02% BR Brazil 2808 3.69% CA Canada 2255 2.97% NL Netherlands 1889 2.48% SE Sweden 1366 1.80% AU Australia 1239 1.63% PL Poland 1118 1.47% MX Mexico 1042 1.37% IT Italy 1034 1.36% UA Ukraine 966 1.27% ES Spain 741 0.97% NO Norway 738 0.97% FI Finland 572 0.75% BE Belgium 570 0.75% CH Switzerland 549 0.72% AR Argentina 457 0.60% DK Denmark 444 0.58% AT Austria 442 0.58% CZ Czech Republic 410 0.54% CN China ....
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
