On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 15:23 +0000, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 03:28:20PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 02:30, Dave Wysochanski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Note that by scanning a single PV we may not be able to answer > > > definitively what VG it is in or what LVs it may contain. So provided > > > we go this route with putting into the udev database all needed > > > information that today you get from pv/vg/lvdisplay commands, something > > > else will have to put together individual PV information to get an > > > accurate picture of the VG / LV info in the system. > > When we discussed this with David in Boston, it became clear that the > udev database as currently implemented was unable to hold the information > LVM2 needs to store. > What are the specific limitations of the udev database that make it unsuitable for LVM?
_______________________________________________ devkit-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel
