On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 18:41 +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote: > Yep, absolutely agree. But even there wouldn't it be nice if e.g. during > the day that server would have a 10us latency for CPU and during the > night automatically transition to higher and higher latencies, up to > even 100ms or so? Or a desktop system that has a screenlock running > overnight, the user forgot to close his firefox window with a flash > plugin running in it.
Sure, that's a great use case. > And devices that take a lot longer to power down resp. up e.g. harddisks > aren't addresses by the latency changes yet if i remember correctly? I don't see why they can't be added, of course, at the moment there's no momentum for this stuff in the kernel because nothing uses it in userspace. Yet. Richard. _______________________________________________ devkit-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel
