On Thursday 24 October 2024 10:12:35 Pacific Daylight Time Thiago Macieira wrote: > > IMO, we could benefit from the new syntax, if we could build our > > implementation on top of what the standard provides for us. But I see > > little benefit in reimplementing the standard from scratch. > > I'm hoping we don't have to do it all. But I don't know yet how far we can > go. Especially since we mean to do a mixed encoding solution:
Here's another one: formatting of floating point types. That's a hard pass on the Standard Library implementations. We already carry code for this in the form of libdoubleconversion, so unless we can ditch that in favour of the Standard Library content, we shouldn't use both, which would increase QtCore code size and possibly introduce differences in behaviour. And we really can't use the the Standard Library ones until sometime in the 2030s, can we? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Principal Engineer - Intel DCAI Platform & System Engineering
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
