> On Sep 19, 2024, at 16:33, Volker Hilsheimer via Development > <development@qt-project.org> wrote: > > My preference would be "static constexpr inline”, as static is the most > important piece of information (storage and calling convention in case of > member functions), constexpr is “good to know”, and inline is in practice > mostly an implementation detail. > > It also has the advantage that it keeps code grep-friendly, i.e. I can search > for anything “static constexpr” (which for out-of-lined members is the clear > preference in existing code), and find everything, even if it’s also inline.
+1 Tor Arne -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
