On Thursday 19 September 2024 01:11:54 GMT-7 Halla Rempt wrote: > Who knows whether anyone is using it? There are zillions of projects using > Qt out in the world, but the people developing Qt keep assuming that "using > Qt" means using Qt inside Qt, as if the entire platform solely exists for > building Qt on top of it. Like when the OpenGL QtPainter class was treated > like a failed experiment for making QWidgets paint faster, even though it > was public API and used in the real world.
I'm not assuming it's all of Qt. But it is the most readily available source of Qt-using code I have, as I don't build KDE content myself any more. > I'm currently porting my Qt-based project, Krita, to Qt 6 and it's a huge, > huge, huge pain. I'm wasting months and months that could have been spent > on improving my application on submitting to useless clean-ups that nobody > seems to have thought were an imposition. I've been through Qt1..2..3..4..5 > and now going through 6. And the reports we've had is that however painful this transition is, it's the least painful of all. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Principal Engineer - Intel DCAI Platform & System Engineering
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
