The fix is here: https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtgrpc/+/533391
-- Alex ________________________________________ From: Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org> on behalf of Frank Meerkötter <frank.meerkoet...@basyskom.com> Sent: Tuesday, 23 January 2024 09:19 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Question about the licensing of the Protobuf-Module Thank you for the clarification On 22.01.24 19:53, Elias Steurer via Development wrote: > This was (sadly) a bug, see comments: > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-117783 > > Cheers 👋, > > Eli > > On 1/22/2024 10:29 AM, Frank Meerkötter wrote: >> I am looking for a clarification on the licensing of the >> Protobuf-Module. >> >> The code in https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtgrpc.git/tree/src/protobuf >> has // SPDX-License-Identifier: LicenseRef-Qt-Commercial OR >> LGPL-3.0-only OR GPL-2.0-only OR GPL-3.0-only >> >> While the code in >> https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtgrpc.git/tree/src/protobufqttypes/protobufqtcoretypes >> has // SPDX-License-Identifier: LicenseRef-Qt-Commercial OR >> GPL-3.0-only WITH Qt-GPL-exception-1.0 >> >> Is this intentional? >> >> Can I - wearing a LGPL3-hat - use the protobuf module? >> >> Thank you, >> Frank >> -- Frank Meerkötter Development Lead basysKom GmbH Robert-Bosch-Str. 7 | 64293 Darmstadt | Germany Tel: +49 6151 870 589 - 161 | Fax: -199 frank.meerkoet...@basyskom.com | http://www.basyskom.com/ Handelsregister: Darmstadt HRB 9352 Geschaeftsfuehrende Partner: Heike Ziegler, Alexander Sorg -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
