On 26.08.23 10:51, Volker Hilsheimer via Development wrote: > It seems to be a rare issue, triggered by specific circumstances. With the > knowledge that we have now, we can fix issues when they arise, and don’t have > to change all the problematic use right now.
Yes, this email was to ensure people are aware of the issue and make fixing inline keyword use part of their drive-by fix toolbox, both for reviewing as well as authoring code. Since this seems to be about using such functions in other out-of-body inline functions, it should be limited to Qt code and there to the actual patch introducing such a use. Unless and until we get user bug reports about this, I don't think there's anything we need to do to existing code. But when we hit it, we should do the whole header, not just that one function. > That’s my understanding at least; I might be wrong, but we have been building > Qt for a few decades on MinGW without this constantly blocking us. Ack. Thanks, Marc -- Marc Mutz <marc.m...@qt.io> Principal Software Engineer The Qt Company Erich-Thilo-Str. 10 12489 Berlin, Germany www.qt.io Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Jouni Lintunen Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
