> -----Original Message----- > From: Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org> On Behalf Of > Kai Uwe Broulik > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 4:17 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] QtQuick Dialogs Widgets fallback > > Hi everyone,
Hi Kai, > we found that the Qt Quick Dialogs (MessageDialog and friends) do not > support a fallback to their widget counterpart like the ones from > Qt.labs.platform did. > > In KDE Plasma we do not provide a platform theme implementation for the > message or color dialogs, as the Qt ones are “good enough”, thus we will get > the QtQuick fallback which are a bit rough for use in a desktop application. Which style are you referring to here? If there's a way we can improve our desktop-based fallbacks, it would be good to know about that. > I understand and fully agree that the Qt Quick Dialogs module shouldn’t link > QtWidgets, but is there a way we could support a fallback to QMessageBox, > QColorDialog, etc, as the labs module did? Assuming that we could make it entirely optional (also for e.g. static builds), I wouldn't be against it, but I'd still prefer to know what could be improved with our (desktop style) Qt Quick fallbacks. > I found [1] which restructures the relevant styles into their own respective > plug-in. Is it possible we add a QtQuick.Dialogs.Widgets import that then > delegates to the relevant widgets, if there’s no platform-provided dialog? I > don’t want to go down the rabbit hole of adding entire proper QFactory* for > what is effectively a single conspicuous plug-in, so I wonder if we could > piggyback on that infrastructure. > > Cheers > Kai Uwe > > [1] https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtdeclarative/+/476748 > -- > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
