Hi All, when I start 2 single shot timers synchronously in a row, with exactly the same interval, from the same thread, can I rely on having their handlers called in the same order in which they were started?
I.e.: QTimer::singleShot(1000, [] { qDebug() << "1st timer elapsed"; }); QTimer::singleShot(1000, [] { qDebug() << "2nd timer elapsed"; }); Should I always see the: 1st timer elapsed 2nd timer elapsed on the output, or should I expect the random order? Asking here, since I can't find the answer in Qt docs. Br, Jarek -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development