Hi All,
when I start 2 single shot timers synchronously in a row, with exactly the same
interval, from the same thread, can I rely on having their handlers called in
the same order in which they were started?
I.e.:
QTimer::singleShot(1000, [] { qDebug() << "1st timer elapsed"; });
QTimer::singleShot(1000, [] { qDebug() << "2nd timer elapsed"; });
Should I always see the:
1st timer elapsed
2nd timer elapsed
on the output, or should I expect the random order?
Asking here, since I can't find the answer in Qt docs.
Br,
Jarek
--
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
