On Freitag, 4. November 2022 16:49:30 CET Thiago Macieira wrote: > I've just hit this: should we make some of our very simple types even > simpler so they're structural types[1] and thus can be passed as template > parameters? > > For example, QFlags. I've just tried it and I get: > > error: ‘QFlags<Qt::AlignmentFlag>’ is not a valid type for a template > non-type parameter because it is not structural > note: ‘QFlags<Qt::AlignmentFlag>::i’ is not public > > [1] https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p0732r2.pdf
Can we even do that, and still preserve ABI and API? Best regards, Allan _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
