Hi Volker, On 14.10.22 17:12, Volker Hilsheimer via Development wrote: > Anyway, I’ve added the respective text to the coding convention wiki > page. > https://wiki.qt.io/Coding_Conventions
Having read the thread in total, I'm surprised about this outcome. AFAIK, we haven't had problems with traditional include guards, yet, and no compelling use-case for #pragma once was presented, so I don't see why we're now allowing it. Esp. since the rule as written is more complicated than "always use header guards". If and when we decide that we have an include guards problem, it was said that clang-tidy has a header guard normalizer, so it would be easy to just run it and use something like QT_GUARD_INCLUDE_OF_<module>_<subdir>_<header> Example: QT_GUARD_INCLUDE_OF_QTCORE_IO_QIODEVICE_H which no-one wants to have to type, but would be trivial for a tool to produce. Thanks, Marc _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
