On Thursday, 8 September 2022 02:23:39 PDT Edward Welbourne wrote: > The reason we plan for Qt 7 is that it's the next time we can make > certain kinds of backwards-incompatible changes. When we decide that > such a change is needed, we plan for it, because we can't do it yet, or > indeed any time soon.
Particularly because we realised that we did not do all the "### Qt 6" changes for 6.0. This time around, we're actually making the changes right now. Many of the changes can be added to Qt 6 itself, if they are simple overloads, and those benefit most people. Some others can't and must instead be hidden with #ifdef. The point of this thread is to discuss what work we should do now, if neither option above can apply or if it becomes too ugly to maintain. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Cloud Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
