This is https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-101649
I don't see why qdoc shouldn't repeat a failed lookup for
\relates T
\fn foo(x)
as if
\fn T::foo(x)
were given, but I guess we all need to first learn to work around it, and then
change back once it's fixed.
But qdoc being weird should _not_ be a reason to make it non-hidden. We want
hidden friends very much, because the alternative is
// foo.cpp
#include <QtCore>
class Foo {};
void f() {
QDataStream ds;
Foo foo;
ds << foo;
$ ninja foo | wc -l
518
HTH,
Marc
On 25.07.22 21:27, Thiago Macieira wrote:
In https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/422690
Build:
https://testresults.qt.io/coin/integration/qt/qtbase/tasks/1658767511
/home/qt/work/qt/qtbase/src/corelib/kernel/qmetatype.cpp:3032: (qdoc) warning:
clang couldn't find function when parsing \fn int qRegisterMetaType(QMetaType
meta)
The function exists because it's unit-tested and compiled. Why can't qdoc see
it? It's a hidden friend, but that's valid C++ and clang should see it.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
