I agree, this feels like it should have some wider discussion. Cheers, tor arne
> On 13 Sep 2021, at 13:27, André Somers <an...@familiesomers.nl> wrote: > > > On 09-09-2021 17:32, Ulf Hermann wrote: >> Hello, >> >> due to the magnitude of the above mentioned bug, I'm considerng to introduce >> a new feature in Qt 6.2.1. The new "@" operator in QML relieves you from >> typing "Qt.resolvedUrl" over and over. See >> https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtdeclarative/+/369987 >> >> Now the question is whether we want to relax the feature freeze for this >> particular issue or not. >> > To me, the fact that this raises discussion on if this syntax should have > other applications perhaps already justifies a "no" to your actual question: > should this be allowed in a bugfix release. > > I would think not just a small library tool but an actual language change > warrants a bit more consideration and should not be introduced in a what is > supposed to be a bugfix release. This is more than just a bugfix, it's a > significant feature. Adding those without giving them proper consideration > seems to be an excellent way to grow ugly warts on the language that will be > very hard to plaster over later on. > > Cheers, > > André > > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
