May 13, 2021 9:59 PM, "Oswald Buddenhagen" <oswald.buddenha...@gmx.de> wrote: > what would interest me is why you chose to host this on your own > infrastructure instead of publicly demanding that tqtc plays by the > rules and hosts the fork on qt project infra, where it belongs, and the > possibility of which is explicitly codified in > https://wiki.qt.io/Branch_Guidelines (note the historical example > given).
Actually, we did not. We suggested that it would be preferential to host this on Qt Project infrastructure. In fact, our leading suggestion was to re-open the branches as per usual and simply don't do the tags/releases. We could not agree on it. Cheers, Eike _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
