On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 22:24, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > A few years ago, Gtk threatened to do that starting with Gtk 4: > > https://lwn.net/Articles/691131/ > > https://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2016/06/13/gtk-4-0-is-not-gtk-4/ > > https://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2016/06/14/gtk-5-0-is-not-gtk-5/ > > > > They changed their minds. > > When those news arose we Qt maintainers felt really really happy that > we maintain Qt, and that's because of BC. > > Qt is already too big to maintain, especially if you are not being > paid for it. Break BC often and finding distro maintainers will be the > hardest thing to do. +1. Frequent BC breaks end up hurting end users, in addition to developers and packagers. They are going to walk, and the developers will follow. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
