On 23/04/2020 05.30, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 12:25, Philippe wrote:
QList is historically a cause of ambiguity, and Qt6 is the chance to get rid of
that.
Indeed. In Qt5, QList is sometimes a list,
sometimes a vector, but in Qt6 it's never a list.
Correction: in Qt5, it is sometimes a vector, and sometimes a
vector-like container that uses indirect storage. It is never a linked
list (although the latter may be somewhat more list-like than vector-like).
...and are we just missing that container type in Qt6?
I would think the better approach would be to keep dev as it is, and
deprecate and eventually remove QList.
Can we please *not* get rid of a useful container type that has no STL
equivalent?
--
Matthew
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
