On Monday, 2 March 2020 08:45:29 CET Jaroslaw Kobus wrote: > Allan Sandfeld Jensen (27 February 2020 23:03) replied: > > That is how I see it too. It essentially violates Qt code guidelines. If > > it > > was a normal method we would name it "emitEmptied()", so far we have just > > lived with "emit emptied()" instead. > > The issue is that if you want to emit a signal, "emitEmptied()" sounds OK, > while when you want to connect to it, you don't want to connect to > "emitEmptied", but to "emptied". > > Just my 4 cents (this amount wasn't offered in this thread, yet). > It came up. There was another suggestion that got around the problem: signalEmptied()
it works because signal is both a noun and a verb :) 'Allan _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
