> AFAIK, we don't have a procedure to make project-level decisions by majority > vote. True. We're discussing now. The goal here is to take people opinions and arguments into account before making a decision.
We have intermediate results of the discussion now. Next step is collecting the rest of feedback we can. Only after we should make a decision and define resulting artifacts (docs, recommendations, user stories, blog posts, etc.). On 2/12/20 12:42 PM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > 12.02.2020, 12:36, "Vitaly Fanaskov" <[email protected]>: >>> You seem to repeat your initial statements. >> Yes, because most of the participants of this discussion tend to agree, >> as far as I can see. > AFAIK, we don't have a procedure to make project-level decisions by majority > vote. > > If we want to achieve anything more constructive than just summarizing > opinions, these > ways are possible: > 1) discuss Daniel's patch in Gerrit and get it approved or rejected; > 2) someone could come up with another proposal in of form of (possibly WIP) > patch > and get it formally reviewed in the same way; > 3) someone could come up with a text of QUIP and get it formally reviewed > -- Best Regards, Fanaskov Vitaly Senior Software Engineer The Qt Company / Qt Quick and Widgets Team _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
