Hi,
On 28/01/2020 12:52, Tino Pyssysalo wrote:
On 27.1.2020, 23.53, "Development on behalf of Thiago Macieira"
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 27 de janeiro de 2020 10:39:44 PST Elvis Stansvik
wrote:
> > So? I have an account because I want to contribute. Does not mean I
> > want to log in to download (especially not from CI).
>
> The CI aspect is actually pretty relevant. Aside from Appveyor, most
other CI
> systems with Windows support (like GitHub Actions) do not have Qt pre-
> installed. What people do to test on Windows is to use recipes that
download
> the pre-compiled binaries and unpack them.
>
> What does the Qt Company suggest software developers do?
>
> (I know there's Conan, vcpkg, etc. I want the Qt Company's official
answer)
Headless installation is important for many Qt users. In the current installer, it is also
possible with scripting but we are making it even more straightforward with
different
command line options in the Qt Installer 4.0, which is the next major version.
It is also possible to transfer the qtaccount.ini file to a CI machine, which
removes the
need for manual/interactive login. The qtaccount.ini just contains the hash of
the password.
Integrating the access control with package managers has resulted to be rather
Large project and we decided to continue with the installer instead, even though
we use vcpkg to enable CMake to build Qt 6 and conan to resolve Qt Marketplace
source code dependencies.
Thanks.
While on the topic of the installer and using a qtaccount.ini file: will
it finally become possible to use the online installer to install
commercial Qt versions? I would find it a huge improvement were I able
to maintain my Qt installations from one installer instead of having to
manage every version separately with offline installers.
André
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
