On 24-12-19 11:28, Martin Smith wrote:
However, instead of adding template<class T> bool qIsEmpty(const T &t) { return t.empty(); } we keep discussing how ugly std is=)But that's kind of ugly too. I read it as qlsEmpty(), not qIsEmpty(). See what I mean? On of those is a lower case L.How about a new approach to adding free functions: template<class T> bool isEmptyQt(const T &t) { return t.empty(); } martin
A namespace seems a more reasonable solution then. André _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
