On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 11:30:29AM +0100, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development wrote: > Il 24/11/19 10:44, Uwe Rathmann ha scritto: > > I fully agree with André - having 2 different APIs makes a lot of sense > > to me. But instead of using count/size I would use something like > > countU/sizeU. like you have QPen::widthF and QPen::width. > > I disagree: it makes the API confusing. The F there stands for floating > point, as opposed to integer (and historically you don't even know _which_ > floating point you get). What would the U stand for exactly?
Well, _some_ placeholder for a suffix. '32' might be explicit, but awkward. My idea with using 'count' was that we currently have three functions doing the same (size, count, length), and giving one more of them a real meaning would be ok. But as I said before, you have a point that the situation is there as well for indexOf() etc. A suffix on all interesting function would allow more uniformity than just having the one special case for getting the size. Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
