> On 26 Sep 2019, at 17:44, Simon Hausmann <simon.hausm...@qt.io> wrote: > > Hi, > > Yeah, custom setters are required. > > One option would be to say that such properties are implemented using the > traditional property system altogether — bridging will be necessary anyway. > > Another option would be to implement what you described, perhaps in a more > convenient way though.
Override operator= maybe? But it might be interesting to have a proper way of signalling errors when a setter fails, instead of having to just use qWarning and hope the developer notices. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
