Il 20/09/19 07:53, Tuukka Turunen ha scritto:
Or remove the wiki entry and make sure platform notes in documentation are in shape?No need for duplicated info on these basic items.
It's a bigger problem -- the *same* wiki is used for official information (e.g. releasing info; coding guidelines; security policies) as well as for unofficial, community-driven content. Nobody knows the official status of any individual page just by looking at it.
So now there's information on the wiki AND in the docs about Qt on INTEGRITY, they both appear on Google search results, and of course they're in contradiction with each other (wiki says that Qt on INTEGRITY is community-driven, docs say it's officially supported; wiki does a shared build, docs say only static builds work).
My 2 c, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
smime.p7s
Description: Firma crittografica S/MIME
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
