On 19/09/2019 21:01, André Pönitz wrote:
"Is it worth" is exactly the question that should drive this kind of discussion. And it can be answered_after_ evaluating, or even guessing the "value" of the available options.
It's not so easy: I, for once, don't have access to INTEGRITY to do any a priori evaluation of the technical feasibility of a solution.
I can test and evaluate the other platforms, though. My webgradient patch will improve the situation on *ALL* platforms because it removes (quoting):
* the binary json representation from QtGui's resources (~4KB compressed, ~50KB uncompressed) * the overhead of reading from the JSON for each used web gradient; * the startup costs of registering the webgradients in the resources; * all the overhead of mutex locking when building such gradients; * all the runtime memory allocations to load, parse and cache the web gradients (including the memory + CPU spike on first load due to the uncompression of the JSON data, as well as a couple of deep copies).
But it cannot go in in Qt 5 because INTEGRITY does not implement C++11's constexpr.
Is it worth it? YES. My 2 c, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
