On Montag, 24. Juni 2019 11:32:15 CEST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > Well, what I’d really like would be a lightweight RichText / HTML+CSS > > viewer without all the baggage of a complete internet browser. QTextBrowser > > does too little, QtWebEngine much too much. > > So, QtWebKit should be the right thing then?
is it maintained and an integral part of a Qt delivery ? It makes little sense to add two web rendering engines into Qt (I would have loved to stay with QtWebKit, but impossible without having it maintained) -- Best regards/Schöne Grüße Martin A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q: Why is top posting bad? () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ - against proprietary attachments Geschenkideen, Accessoires, Seifen, Kulinarisches: www.lillehus.at _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
