On 21/06/2019 14:57, Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
I’m not Jarek, but I recall that Eddy made a suggestion [1] which I think has been prematurely dismissed or at least not been discussed sufficiently, which is:

* move the Qt Assistant functionality for searching and qch support into a locally executed HTTP server * use any proper webbrowser to display the help that this web service serves


What would be arguments against such a solution?


Volker

[1] https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2019-May/036028.html


In our application, we already provide our manual in three different formats, generated from the same source (by doxygen): qhc/Assistant, PDF and HTML served from our company website. The great advantage of qhc and Assistant is that the content in Assistant can be easily and efficiently synchronised by the click of some specific "Help" button in the UI to bring up content specific to the context of that button, without creating new tabs in your web browser. The most important feature of Assistant, though, is its index and search functionality. Will qthttpserver be able to do that, scrolling to the right position and highlighting the indexed word?

Bastiaan.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development

Reply via email to