Am 13.06.2019 um 23:44 schrieb Konstantin Tokarev:

14.06.2019, 00:14, "Christian Ehrlicher" <ch.ehrlic...@gmx.de>:
Am 13.06.2019 um 22:09 schrieb Ville Voutilainen:
  That's one of the things I love about Qt; object hierarchies give me
  working dynamic memory management without needing even smart pointers.
  That's the one thing that makes me queasy about using Qt in large
  applications; I always need
  to worry about ownership relationships, because I can't program with
  smart pointers. I had the pleasure
  of writing smart-pointer-only code 20 years ago; it was quite
  pleasant, especially considering that
  the largeish application was leaking like a sieve and doing
  use-after-free in all too many places.
  Once we plugged boost's smart pointers into it, all those problems
  went away over a weekend,
  and we never looked back.
A very good example on how to kill a library by simply using smart
pointer everywhere is QtXmlPatterns:

https://bugreports.qt.io/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20QTBUG%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Reported%20AND%20component%20%3D%20%22XML%3A%20QtXmlPatterns%22%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC
Any proffs that any of these issues were caused by smart pointers?
Otherwise I would not have mentioned it. Just take a look at the code
and one of the bug report issues... it awesome and you will see why
nobody want/can maintain this library.

Christian
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development

Reply via email to