> This was a case where I thought it is obvious already. The definition of > "Done" (given by Thiago earlier in this thread) has not applied for a > long time anymore. There hasn't been maintainer for a long time. I > understand this leave use cases in the dust but this can only by averted > if somebody steps up to actively main this module. There is no point > claiming support otherwise.
> Nothing has been decided at this stage but unless a new maintainer can be > found, it might even slip into Removed state in Qt 6. > Please consider this mail as an official announcement of Qt Xml Patterns > deprecation. It's good that Bernhard has received an official statement. In general, I think the Qt Company could make a little more effort to communicate such decisions, educate its user community, and attract new potential maintainers. Actually, communication should start before a problem results in a decision. Isn't that an important aspect of community building? _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
