On 2019-05-20 23:21, André Pönitz wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:48:29PM +0200, Mutz, Marc via Development
wrote:
On 2019-05-20 22:18, André Pönitz wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:17:10AM +0200, Mutz, Marc via Development
> wrote:
> > [...] There is no readability difference between the use of a Qt
> > container and
> > that of an STL container.
>
> Exhibit A:
>
> foo().contains(x)
>
>
> Exhibit B:
>
> {
> ... container = foo();
> std::find(container.begin(), container.end(), x) !=
> container.end();
> }
And now do the same thing [...]
No, I won't.
You were claiming something universally valid (\forall x "There is
no difference ...")
I never said that there's no difference. I said there's no difference in
readability. Don't confuse familiarity with simplicity (or readability).
and when presented a counterexample you jumped
to a "but \exists "There is no difference ..." line of "reasoning".
This is a completely different statement.
Andre'
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
