On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 11:02 PM Иван Комиссаров <abba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Which should be considered bad practice and banned on an API level > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 11:30 PM Иван Комиссаров <abba...@gmail.com> wrote: > By forcing usage of smart pointers, of course. > That's a joke, right? Smart pointers aren't pointers, they are *stack*-based (auto-storage) objects that manage pointers. I draw the line to pay one heap allocation for binary compatibility not two, one of them being the size of void * mind you, wherever I can help it. C++ is a stack-based language, are you intending to reinvent it?
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
