Liang Qi (25 January 2019 14:17) > Looks like the index was also regenerated for October 2016, > > [Development] Coin news - Jedrzej Nowacki > Tue Oct 25 10:22:41 EEST 2016 > > Current link: > https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2016-October/055084.html > > It was: > http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2016-October/027542.html > > via > https://web.archive.org/web/20161108191742/http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2016-October/thread.html
The pages have all been updated and had their URLs changed. Or are you trying to tell me something else ? I'm not sure I fully understand. I've just pushed a change for review, that updates all existing QUIPs to use URLs in the new archive; and commented on all pending QUIPs in review on my best guesses at which URLs in the new archive match the ones they refer to in the old one. See various reviews at: * https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/status:open+project:meta/quips,n,z I note, in passing, that there are several outstanding reviews that seem not to have moved in a long time. Please think about what you're doing with those QUIPs, authors and reviewers. As part of that, I've also updated the heroku instance that displays the current state of everything; it uses the most recent patch set from each outstanding review, plus some clean-up of mine (renaming quip-*.txt to quip-*.rst and fixing the URLs to those I suggested in reviews). If you find any remaining broken links in those, please let me know. * https://quips-qt-io.herokuapp.com Now I shall go home and have a week-end that feels over-due, Eddy. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
