Dnia czwartek, 24 stycznia 2019 11:24:41 CET Vitaly Fanaskov pisze: > > Why not X instead? > > ------------------ > > > > - GitFlow, GitHub <= both are based on feature branches, that doesn't work > > well with gerrit. > > So, the only problem here is gerrit (aside from personal preferences and > habits of course). The question is shouldn't we abandon gerrit as this > tool doesn't feet with the needs well? Inventing new approaches is of > course super cool... But not always necessary. > > What's wrong with using, say, gitflow + gitlab + upsource? Upsource is > optional, but it's the way better for code review than gerrit.
That is a completely different discussion. If we ever want to change the tooling we can re-consider branching model too. Cheers, Jędrek _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
