Renamed discussion topic. :) Agree with Uwe. I was using Qwt for many years and was surprised when Qt Charts appeared. Thought it has some advantages or interesting effects. If not, it is also not clear to me why not to contribute to Qwt which is feature rich, extremely fast and make it candy, modern look and feel and standard de facto for Qt? Existing chart solutions for Qt are too poor comparing with D3.js features for example - good to improve!
-- Best regards, Aleksey Linked in https://www.linkedin.com/in/alekseykontsevich 10.01.2019, 14:22, "Uwe Rathmann" <uwe.rathm...@tigertal.de>: > On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:48:37 +0000, Tuukka Turunen wrote: > >> Related to your comment about the Qt Charts being limited I would tend >> to disagree. > > https://www.qtcentre.org/threads/69718-QChartView-and-QScatterSeries- > overrdide-the-label-of-a-QPointF > > https://www.qtcentre.org/threads/69094-3D-Plot > > I leave it up to you to google for more ... > > You might have noticed, that questions on the Qt mailing lists regarding > Qt/Charts mostly end up in not being answered, but at least you find this > statement from the maintainer: > > https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2016-November/ > 055337.html > > If you prefer "simple charting" or "not be the be-all-end-all charting > solution" over "limited" - I don't care, we can agree on Miikkas wording. > > But it doesn't affect my conclusion, that Qt users ( including your > customers ) would have a better solution, if you would have contributed > to an existing 3rd party library instead of reinventing the wheel. > >> Discussion about Qt Charts is of course welcome, but perhaps not that >> relevant for discussion about creating a new repository for Lottie-Qt. > > True, but Qt/Chart is a good example of what happens, when ignoring > existing 3rd party software without technical reasons. > > And on a more general note: if LGPLv2+ makes code not being appropriate > for the Qt project, then don't be surprised that you are not attractive > for developers without having a business case in mind. > > My 2 cents, > Uwe > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
