On 15/12/2018 15.49, Ray Donnelly wrote: > Do you know for example that cmake will find dlls in C:\Windows\System32,
Uh... yeah? I think most people *expect* that... Would you also rather CMake didn't look in /usr/lib[64] on Linux systems? *Why*? > find_package is still inscrutable, and it's for sure the cause of > most issues we see as software packagers). Well, yeah, find modules are... not ideal. Modern software should be providing package configuration files with exported targets. If we switched to CPS¹ (SHTDI!), that would be even better (mostly-human-readable files that don't use CMake syntax). (¹ https://mwoehlke.github.io/cps/) -- Matthew _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
