>1) To contact the contributor first and try to resolve the issue civilly. >2) To seek help with a third party (another contributor) who is known to the >alleged victim and who can act as mediator to try an resolve it. >3) If 1) and 2) don't work he/she may also bring it to the attention of the >community (e.g. the mailing list). The community is then free to react or not >to >react.
You just specified a code of conduct. The problem with your code of conduct is that it isn't guaranteed to end in resolution. >The implication that currently, if you're feeling mistreated, it's impossible >to act >(respectfully) against harassment seems rather far-fetched to me. But that isn't the implication. The implication is that a mistreated person can take the actions you have specified, and the result can be that the mistreatment, real or not, is not resolved. ________________________________________ From: Konstantin Shegunov <kshegu...@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2018 3:48:49 PM To: Martin Smith Cc: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] QUIP 12: Code of Conduct On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 4:09 PM Martin Smith <martin.sm...@qt.io<mailto:martin.sm...@qt.io>> wrote: In that case, if a contributor is mistreated by another contributor, what recourse does the victim have? 1) To contact the contributor first and try to resolve the issue civilly. 2) To seek help with a third party (another contributor) who is known to the alleged victim and who can act as mediator to try an resolve it. 3) If 1) and 2) don't work he/she may also bring it to the attention of the community (e.g. the mailing list). The community is then free to react or not to react. The implication that currently, if you're feeling mistreated, it's impossible to act (respectfully) against harassment seems rather far-fetched to me. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
