Enumerations inside of classes makes dependency breaking harder. We don't use that in Qt but users of our interface may do. It's still possible but much more complex because you generally get much more dependencies. A simple header file for enumerations instead can simply be included without any additional dependencies. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
- Re: [Development] Naming convention for (scoped) enu... Tor Arne Vestbø
- Re: [Development] Naming convention for (scoped) enu... Eike Ziller
- Re: [Development] Naming convention for (scoped) enu... André Pönitz
- Re: [Development] Naming convention for (scoped) enu... Simon Hausmann
- Re: [Development] Naming convention for (scoped) enu... Edward Welbourne
- Re: [Development] Naming convention for (scoped) enu... Alex Blasche
- Re: [Development] Naming convention for (scoped) enu... Tor Arne Vestbø
- Re: [Development] Naming convention for (scoped) enu... Eike Ziller
- Re: [Development] Naming convention for (scoped) enu... Jan-Arve Sæther
- Re: [Development] Naming convention for (scoped) enu... Tor Arne Vestbø
- Re: [Development] Naming convention for (scoped) enu... Marco Bubke
- Re: [Development] Naming convention for (scoped) enu... Simon Hausmann
- Re: [Development] Naming convention for (scoped) enu... Jan-Arve Sæther
- Re: [Development] Naming convention for (scoped) enu... Alex Blasche
- Re: [Development] Naming convention for (scoped) enu... Allan Sandfeld Jensen
- Re: [Development] Naming convention for (scoped) enu... Tor Arne Vestbø