> On 17 Aug 2018, at 17:08, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Friday, 17 August 2018 02:50:32 PDT Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: >>> Unless someone can volunteer to test. I *think* my design is slightly >>> better than QJsonValue, so the following should work: >>> >>> value[1]["hello"][32] = false; >> >> That’s great news. I assume it’s also easy to convert from and to JSON, so >> that one could use QCbor as an intermediate data format if one needs to >> modify JSON In place and write it out again? > > Please note I said that I *think* it should work, not that it does work. > Could > you give it a try and see if it makes your life easier? > > Now, looking at the code, I don't think it does work. I thought that > QCborValue::operator[] returned QCborValueRefs, but it doesn't. Adding a set > of non-const overloads returning QCborValueRef might be the trick.
That would be great to have as part of the API yes > And it's a trick we can add to QJsonValue too. That would be great, but I think it was kind of tricky with the current design of QJsonValue. Tor Arne _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
