> On 14 Aug 2018, at 13:13, Eike Ziller <eike.zil...@qt.io> wrote: > > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2347.pdf states the > problems that were the driver for creating strongly typed enums: > > 1. Implicit conversion to integer > 2. Inability to specify underlying type
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/enum describes types for unscoped enums too, curious, what’s the difference for the scoped enums? > 3. Scoping > >> that specifically mentions the enum inside a class use case a primary driver? > > Why would the implicit conversion problem be any different for enums inside a > class? It wouldn’t. I was referring to the scoping/name clash, which is what this discussion has been largely focusing on (so far). Tor Arne _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
