+1

28.07.2018, 11:56, "André" <[email protected]>:
> Hello all,
>
> I'd like to propose Samuel as approver. He has been active in the Qt project 
> for ages.
>
> He not only provides code changes [0], he is also active reviewing others 
> changes [1].
>
> But that's not all: Samuel is *extremly* active in the Qt Forum [2], where he 
> works
> as moderator and answers plenty of questions every day.
>
> Some of his patches arised from forum questions, therefore Samuel perfectly 
> bridges
> between the end users and the Qt main developers.
>
> I think this all qualifies Samuel for the approver status.
>
> Best regards,
> André
>
> [0] 
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/owner:%22Samuel+Gaist+%253Csamuel.gaist%2540idiap.ch%253E%22,n,z
> [1] 
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Samuel+Gaist+%253Csamuel.gaist%2540idiap.ch%253E%22,n,z
> [2] https://forum.qt.io/user/sgaist
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

-- 
Regards,
Konstantin

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to