Fair enough.. It just seems that this thread has fundamentally become a religious issue over format, and when it should be forced on people...
I fight this all the time in my organization... I usually come to the conclusion, code in the style you want, unless it's a bad format. And like pornography, I cant define it but I know it when I see it... But IMO, wholesale "format changes" have zero value to the customer, so any pain associated with them, should be weighed against the time and effort necessary to implement a format change that is being taken away from customer oriented development. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Development <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 08:26 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Development] clang-format On Friday, 22 June 2018 07:40:58 PDT Scott Bloom wrote: > In a series of wrapper scripts, essentially, everything checked in was > converted to the check in format. However each developer had their > own format . And on checkout, the code would be compare to it. > > On "Diff" analysis of two reversions, you had to see the diff based on > the checked in format. > > It really made things, that much simpler... and we never heard people > bitch and moan about where the curley brackets belong Git has such a functionality, it's called the clean/smudge filters. See man gitattributes for more information. But that still means the code you see is subject to the smudge filter's whims. We've concluded that it doesn't always do the right thing. And besides, there's something new that didn't exist in the old days: code reviews. Gerrit has no such functionality and in any case, reviewers need to agree between themselves on what they ar reviewing. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
